Fake Drawing
Moderators: Brendan, Phan-Tom, duey
My DA: http://phan-tom.deviantart.com/
Feeling sorry for those critics who talk nonsense in the hope of appearing well-informed.
Feeling sorry for those critics who talk nonsense in the hope of appearing well-informed.
My DA: http://phan-tom.deviantart.com/
Feeling sorry for those critics who talk nonsense in the hope of appearing well-informed.
Feeling sorry for those critics who talk nonsense in the hope of appearing well-informed.
The guy who did the "Dr. House" piece has another upload at DA
mixing photos with drawings.
mixing photos with drawings.
My DA: http://phan-tom.deviantart.com/
Feeling sorry for those critics who talk nonsense in the hope of appearing well-informed.
Feeling sorry for those critics who talk nonsense in the hope of appearing well-informed.
My DA: http://phan-tom.deviantart.com/
Feeling sorry for those critics who talk nonsense in the hope of appearing well-informed.
Feeling sorry for those critics who talk nonsense in the hope of appearing well-informed.
Anyone else take a look at his Deviant ID picture? He's a real "looker".
Also, do you think his drawing of a 19th century house is stolen? He claims it's an old drawing that is far worse than his current stuff, but to me it looks far better than anything else he's drawn...
And I know Phan-Tom was probably all over this so apologies if this is redundant, but I wasn't a part of the discussion if it has gone on. With the Dr. House drawing... the face looks drawn but the hair looks faked. Far too realistic, as if it's just a blurred photograph. His WIP's for that drawing show the stages of the face, but none of them have any of the hair drawn in. If you look at the place where his sideburn meets the hair, and also the hair over the ear, it looks like he tried to hide the border between drawing and photo by just blurring it.

Also, do you think his drawing of a 19th century house is stolen? He claims it's an old drawing that is far worse than his current stuff, but to me it looks far better than anything else he's drawn...
And I know Phan-Tom was probably all over this so apologies if this is redundant, but I wasn't a part of the discussion if it has gone on. With the Dr. House drawing... the face looks drawn but the hair looks faked. Far too realistic, as if it's just a blurred photograph. His WIP's for that drawing show the stages of the face, but none of them have any of the hair drawn in. If you look at the place where his sideburn meets the hair, and also the hair over the ear, it looks like he tried to hide the border between drawing and photo by just blurring it.
Just your typical waffle-loving Canadian.
My Portfolio: http://www.redbubble.com/people/canadianmaple09
My Portfolio: http://www.redbubble.com/people/canadianmaple09
I would say the drawing of the 19th century house is far more advanced than the rest of his work.
As for Dr. House, he's overlaying a little bit of drawing with photos.
This one shows telltale signs of dodging and blurring.
http://kl3r1k.deviantart.com/art/Fairys ... -119702586
As for Dr. House, he's overlaying a little bit of drawing with photos.
This one shows telltale signs of dodging and blurring.
http://kl3r1k.deviantart.com/art/Fairys ... -119702586
My DA: http://phan-tom.deviantart.com/
Feeling sorry for those critics who talk nonsense in the hope of appearing well-informed.
Feeling sorry for those critics who talk nonsense in the hope of appearing well-informed.
Just your typical waffle-loving Canadian.
My Portfolio: http://www.redbubble.com/people/canadianmaple09
My Portfolio: http://www.redbubble.com/people/canadianmaple09
My DA: http://phan-tom.deviantart.com/
Feeling sorry for those critics who talk nonsense in the hope of appearing well-informed.
Feeling sorry for those critics who talk nonsense in the hope of appearing well-informed.
My DA: http://phan-tom.deviantart.com/
Feeling sorry for those critics who talk nonsense in the hope of appearing well-informed.
Feeling sorry for those critics who talk nonsense in the hope of appearing well-informed.
Why do these guys often choose pieces with masses of hair.. to the trained eye that's gonna give 'em away, especially when each strand is perfect
..btw the ''drawing'' depicts another deviant, i'm guessing he recieved permission and now he's recieving the credit.
EDIT: Here's the first comment on that ''drawing'' it seems it's recognizable to the untrained eye too ''They don't believe that someone can draw a hair so perfect. Your hairs're just GREAT. I like too her pretty face.'' difference is, they're more trusting.

EDIT: Here's the first comment on that ''drawing'' it seems it's recognizable to the untrained eye too ''They don't believe that someone can draw a hair so perfect. Your hairs're just GREAT. I like too her pretty face.'' difference is, they're more trusting.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest