Somebody finally used one of my pieces without permission

But I don't care.
http://www.dodecaheathens.com/?p=493

Here .. we'll pay them back :

That's probably not their work either.

I also got a response from the aurochs balloon guy last night.




"I have read phantom posts about my aurochs img.
At the present, i belive that the img have some mistakes too.

This is too funny.

Do you have a link for that ?

http://www.carnivoraforum.com/index.cgi ... 232&page=8

Looks like my taunting worked.
All of the "Balloon Aurochs" have been removed from Wikipedia.

Found another one of my aurochs drawings on somebody's blog.
once again... not offended.
Nice to know somebody likes it.
http://souljournaler.blogspot.com/2010/ ... pture.html

Yeah ... you can't really blame them. How many quality auroch drawings are out there ?

"Ah yes, the famous (or infamous) passages about unicorns in the King James Version of the Bible. Most of the newer translations translate this wild ox and rightfully so. So what we are talking about here is a rather ugly bovine"

Ugly bovine? Now that's what I call a critique.

[quote="zach97"]dont all cows look the sama for the most part...
[qoute/]

To people who don't deal or work with them most cattle do look simalir to each other. But each breed varies, even cows in the same breed vary in their look/body type not all meet the standard of breed perfection.

Plural, Mr Tom? Surely 'an Auroch'